Toward a personalized screening from 40 years-old: 

Breast cancer remains a serious disease, associated with long-term after-effect and its treatments are heavy, even at an early stage. Its prognosis is related to biology and tumor mass at diagnosis. Although treatment has led to significant advances, breast cancer screening remains a necessity. Screening mammography allows for earlier diagnosis and a lower risk of death from breast cancer. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Current screening for breast cancer in Western countries is focused on mammography, with modalities and target populations that vary from one country to another, but include women aged 50 to 69 at least (74 in France). ). The methods of screening as it is practiced today have limitations: limited benefit, imperfect sensitivity, over-diagnosis, irradiation and starting at age 50, whereas more than 20% of cancers occur before age 50.

It seems necessary to improve both the objective performance of screening and the performance felt by the population. One of the improvement solutions is the establishment of a personalized screening whose frequency and modalities depend on the risk of each patient. A risk factor increases the probability of developing breast cancer; it is evaluated statistically.

This individualized approach, has the advantage of being theoretically more acceptable to people than screening for all without distinction outside of age.

Screening and prevention adapted to the level of risk are standard measures in public health, validated in many areas such as metabolism, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases …

A highly efficient model of personalized risk-based screening and prevention is the management of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer, in relation to germinal mutations in the BRCA1 / 2, TP53, PALB2, etc. genes. It has been shown for the most frequent cases, in relation to BRCA1 and BRCA2, an improvement in overall life expectancy, by intensive specific screening and / or surgical prevention (levels of evidence II) 7.

Personalized screening could have significant effects in terms of public health, starting with a decrease in breast cancers diagnosed at an advanced stage, and in the longer term, a decrease in mortality from breast cancer.

The MammoRisk test allowed me to get out of the measure to offer personalized monitoring that I adapted to the individual risk of breast cancer for each woman.


Source :

[1]Delaloge, S., Bachelot, T., Bidard, F. C., Espie, M., Brain, E., Bonnefoi, H., … & Jacquin, J. P. (2016). Dépistage du cancer du sein: en route vers le futur. Bulletin du Cancer103(9), 753-763.

References :

[2] , Broeders M, Moss S, Nyström L, Njor S, Jonsson H, Paap E, Massat N, Duffy S, Lynge E, Paci E; EUROSCREEN Working Group. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:14-25

[3] Mandelblatt JS, Stout NK, Schechter CB, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL et al. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer screening Strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):215-25.

[4] Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, et al. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86.

[5] Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, Davidson B, Mongtomery RC, Crowley MJ, McCrory DC, Kendrick A, Sanders GD. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34.

[6] Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Bouvard V,et al. International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group. Breast-cancer screening–viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2353-8

[7] Saadatmand S, Obdeijn IM, Rutgers EJ, Oosterwijk JC, Tollenaar RA, et al. Survival benefit in women with BRCA1 mutation or familial risk in the MRI screening study (MRISC). Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;137(7):1729-38